spelaeus group). Based on morphometrics and the evolutionary levels of the teeth, the remains are ascribed
to Ursus ingressus Rabeder & al. 2004. Two bone samples dated using radiocarbon-AMS provided the rst
absolute dates from the Arzberg Cave and revealed that the cave bear used this cave between at least 29,000
and 36,000 years BP.
The lithic artefact which was found in the new excavation area 9 looks like the old nd from 1995. Accord-
ing to available radiometric age data, the cave bear remains and the typology of the artefact should be as-
signed to the Aurignacian. We can denitely add the Arzberg Cave to the list of the Upper Palaeolithic
Alpine caves.
The present appearance of the cave entrances were heavily inuenced by the last Glacial Maximum. Thus,
not only the vertical wall was revised, but also former entrances were eroded by the glacier.
Another interesting feature is the presence of numerous polished rocks along passages in the upper gallery,
interpreted as Bärenschliffe (Trimmel 1947, Plan et al. 2009b). Further investigations on the Bärenschliffe
show that the cave bears and probably Palaeolithic man used the “old entrance” (4) and the upper passages
to enter the cave.
References:
Döppes, D., Pacher, M. & Rabeder, G. (2009): Die paläontologische Probegrabung in der Arzberghöhle bei
Wildalpen (Steiermark). – Die Höhle, 60 (1-4): 28-32.
Plan, L., Klampfer, A., Koppensteiner, S. & Behm, M. (2009a): Bearbeitete Höhlen in der Hochschwab-
gruppe im Jahr 2008. – Höhlenkundliche Mitteilung des Landesvereins für Höhlenkunde Wien und
Niederösterreich, 65 (7-8): 77–87.
Plan, L., Döppes, D. & Wagner, T. (2009b): The signicance of cave bears for passage morphology in caves.
– Abstract Karst Horizons: 15th International Congress of Speleology, Kerrville Texas, USA, July
19–26.
Rabeder, G., Hofreiter, M., Nagel, D. & Withalm, G. (2004): New taxa of Alpine cave bears (Ursidae, Car-
nivora). – Cahiers scientiques Lyon, 2: 49–67.
Redtenbacher, A. (1874): Reste von Ursus spelaeus aus einer Höhle bei Wildalpen in Obersteiermark. – Ver-
handlungen der kaiserlich-königlichen Geologischen Reichsanstalt, 1874: 16–17.
Trimmel, H. (1947): Vorläuger Bericht über die Befahrung der Arzberghöhle bei Wildalpen. – Bundesdenk-
malamt, Wien.
✉
1
2
Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Kommission für Quartärforschung und Institut für Paläontologie,
gernot.rabeder@univie.ac.at
Tamara Dogandžić
Small artifact assemblages in the Middle Paleolithic of the southern Balkans: „Micromousterian“
at the site of Bioče (Montenegro)
Late Middle Paleolithic of the southern Balkan region (Croatia, Montenegro, Greece) is characterized by the
industries that are usually named „Micromousterian“, whose main feature is small artifact size. Even though
Middle Paleolithic industries with small artifact sizes have been recognized across Europe, North Africa and
the Near East, there is no consensus on the factors that lead to forming these industries. These factors may
include the absence of larger local raw materials, intensive utilization of lithic resources, as well as the inten-
tional production of small blanks and tools through the independent technological process. The main disa-
greement about these industries revolves around the question of intentionality of small-ake and small-tool
production. The small-sized industries of the coastal areas of the Balkan peninsula were so far interpreted
either as a consequence of the small size of locally available raw materials, by analogy with the near-by Pon-
tinian industries
1
, or as intentional production of small blanks and tools even when larger nodules were lo-
cally available, as in the case of some „Micromousterian“ industries in Greece
2
.
This poster will present the analysis of the lithic industry from the site of Bioče in Montenegro, one of the
sites described as belonging to „Micromousterian“. In order to better understand the factors that formed
Comentários a estes Manuais